The 1814 Campaign dissected.
Strategic situation
France is on the defence and the Emperor
Napoleon has ordered a French Corps to defend towns which lead directly to
Paris. These are Reims, Soissons, Sezanne and Provins. The Bavarians have
remained loyal to the Emperor but the Prussians from the north, the Russians
from the east and the Austrians from the south are all closing in on Paris. The map used was the Napoleon at Bay map from the Avalon Hill series and cost about £30 to buy, plus a bit more to have it laminated.
Unbeknown
to the Allies the French had static spies (pre-set from the beginning) in Sens, St
Dizier, Epernay, Laon and Noyon. This was to represent “fighting on home soil”
and was also designed to prevent the Allies sneaking round the edges of the map,
which would have been unrealistic and might have given them an unfair advantage.
The French could discuss progress as a team with a centralised command
structure while the Allies were forbidden to consult unless their units
actually met on the map. Even then information was delayed and little detail
given.
DAY 1.
The French.
The
umpire allocated start positions to 60% of the French army. However the 1st
Infantry Division (2 brigades of Old G, 1 brigade of Middle G, and 1 brigade of
Young G) as well as the 1st Cav Division (3 brigades, 1 heavy, 1
medium, and 1 light) could be given their start positions (not within 10 hexes
of the edge of the map) by the French team and it was decided that these should
straddle the Sommesous to Vitry le Francois road south of Chalons-sur-Marne
while the cavalry were concentrated just north of Sommesous towards Vatry.
Other units were spread out and brigades (acting as garrisons) were to defend
the towns of Provins, Sezanne, Reims and Soissons. No units were allocated to
defend Paris or west of the Provins/Soissons line.
The French plan.
Wait
for the Russians to cross the river Marne at the Vitry le Fancois bridge and
crush them with overwhelming forces. Success or failure the French were to fall
back to Paris.
The Prussians.
The
Prussians approached from the north-east and the umpire allocated all start
positions and units moved towards Rethel and Vouziers.
The Prussian plan.
To
take and hold Reims and then move west and take and hold Soissons.
The Russians.
The
Russians were approaching from the east in two columns. One moving towards
Chalons-sur-Marne and the other was already in St Dizier moving towards Vitry
le Francois.
The Russian plan.
To
move north-west, link up with Prussian forces and take Reims. There was never
any intention to cross the bridge at Vitry le Francois.
The Austrians.
The
Austrians began moving on move 3 as they had been delayed by poor weather
over-night. Their whole column was approaching Troyes.
The Austrian plan.
To
provide a cavalry screen to the north / north-east, shielding their main body
advance which was to head towards Sens and ultimately Paris in a left flanking
manoeuvre.
Moves 1-4
Prussian
forces moved on Reims. French engineers wasted no time to trying to blow the
two bridges. The Russians by-passed the
bridge at Vitry le Francois and moved towards Chalons-sur-Marne where the
French quickly blew the bridge. French units watched the Russians move
north-west. The spy in St Dizier giving vital information as to what units had
passed through this town. The Austrians moved to Troyes and then moved west
towards Sens but once in Sens the French knew what was coming. (that spy
again!)
Moves 5-8.
The
Prussians attacked Reims across the one bridge that was still available to
cross, only one having been blown. A Prussian horse battery managed to prevent
the French engineers from fully completing their task. The first Prussian
attack was unsuccessful but the second attack, spear headed by Otto von Pennitz
secured a foot hold in Reims and street fighting ensued. Finally by the end of
move 8, Reims had fallen, with Russian units preventing any escape to the
south-west.. One whole French brigade, including engineers and a foot battery
was now in the bag. The Div C and Brigade C both shot themselves.
The
warning signs for the French were there and it was not until move 5 that The
French Corps commander had reluctantly admitted that a quick victory over the
Russians was now unlikely and that a rapid withdrawal west to prevent the
Austrians taking Paris was vital.
Opportunities missed? Easy to say for the umpire of course but there
were perhaps two. One for each side. The Russian column moving north from Vitry
le Fancois had become strung out and the three Russian brigades of infantry at
the rear had become detached because their protecting cavalry had raced ahead.
Would the French (who knew their dispositions and movement) take a risk and cut
them off? It might well have worked. The Russian C-in-C was more than 10 hexes
from those units that could have been called back to help. Only one Russian
brigade of cavalry could have got back to help while the French had both their
Guard cavalry brigade and a heavy brigade available within one hour’s reach
from engaging the Russians. A risk yes and attacking across a single bridge not
easy but a gamble worth taking? Perhaps. The forward French light cavalry
brigade at the bridge with two horse batteries would have pinned the Russian
infantry early on and their two horse batteries would have done some damage.
French infantry moving across the bridge might have finished the job. But
attacking across a single bridge….? Not for the faint hearted.
The
other concerned the Austrians. Had the forward Austrian heavy cavalry brigade
that was in hex 1747 at the end of move 7 not slowed and gone straight for
Paris there was little (nothing in fact) to stop it. The French had a brigade
of cavalry racing back but the Austrians had 2 more light cavalry scouting
regts that would have been able to direct the heavy brigade along the least
well defended road to Paris. But not even the veteran Austrian commander could
believe that the French would take such a risk.
Moves 9-10 and end of Day 1.
The
Prussians secured Reims but to do this effectively it was felt that a whole
division of three brigades would be required. The French had successfully blown
both bridges north of Soissons so the Prussians main body was forced to go “the
long way round” via Laon and Noyon. Russian forces concentrated overnight south
of Reims with cavalry brigades moving west towards Soisson before nightfall.
The
French moved several cavalry brigades west to try block any danger of Paris
falling prematurely. The bulk of the infantry including all 4 Guards brigades
concentrated around Sezanne. The Austrians kept a strong screen of cavalry
south-west of Provins while the main body of infantry moved towards Montereau,
their engineers blowing bridges to the rear of the column as they went.
DAY 2.
The French plan.
To block
the Austrians (and any other late Allied arrivals) taking Paris with one force
and another force to hold Provins/Sezanne.
The Prussian plan.
The cavalry were to race ahead via Compeigne
and head south to Paris. The infantry to follow on.
The Russian plan.
To
take and hold Soissons and then move on to Paris.
The Austrian plan.
Largely
unchanged from Day 1. To move north-west and attempt to take Paris.
Moves 11-14.
The
Prussians began their flanking move while Russian Cossack forces entered Soissons
only to find that the town had been deserted. So a second objective had now
been taken for the Allies. The bulk of the French army halted in and around
Sezanne. The Allies were still unaware as to where the French main body lay. The
Austrians, keen to maintain a strong screen resisted a French attempt to force
a passage west at Nangis.
The battle of Nangis.
French
7th brigade comprised 6 bns of conscripts plus a foot battery with 3
light cavalry regts up against 2 Austrian heavy cavalry regts plus HA battery
supported by 2 light cavalry regts. The Austrians had better quality units and
better commanders overall. The subsequent cavalry clash resulted in the French
light cavalry withdrawing having had their 4th Chasseurs wiped out.
The French infantry (now without cavalry support) were forced into square where
their gunners also sought refuge.
Why
the French chose to attack here is still a mystery. The French knew they had
light cavalry up against heavy cavalry. The Austrians knew that the French
cavalry was either light or medium and yet the French still chose to attack.
The French were re-enforced by a lone light
cavalry regt which had been forced back by an Austrian cavalry brigade coming
from Nogent-sur-Seine. This Austrian unit trotted straight through Provins,
taking this objective, although only briefly as it had orders to hit the French
force in the rear. The opportunity for the French brigade to fall back to
Provins (probably leaving its artillery behind) was now lost. Austrian light
cavalry moved to both the north and south of the French 7th Brigade
to complete its encirclement. The final outcome was all too predictable. One
French light cavalry regiment got away. The rest was either destroyed (2
battalions of infantry and 2 regts of light cavalry) while the rest
surrendered. The Austrians suffered one light cavalry regiment being destroyed
but all in all it was a resounding Austrian success and prevented this brigade
from moving west to help defend Paris.
Meanwhile
the race was on for Prussian and Russian units to get as far west as possible. Russian
units moved more cautiously as their southern/left flank was more exposed to a
counter attack. Had there been more Russian light cavalry in those areas it
would have become apparent that there was little or no French forces to
threaten them. The Austrians still had their work cut out to take Paris before
nightfall. Were there enough hours left in Day 2 for either the Russians or
Prussians to make an impact and help the Austrians in taking this objective?
Would the French take the initiative and move west with the Guard units, pin
down the Austrians and defeat them, while the Russians and Prussians were still
too far away to make an impact?
A
ceasefire was announced before move 15 could take place as the final Battle for
Paris drew nearer.
The
units that would take part in this final phase would be:
FRENCH
Infantry: B9, B10, B11 brigades including one foot
battery.
B5 brigade would arrive shortly. (with the only engineers who could help
blow up bridges and build redoubts)
None
of these units were Guard. All the best French infantry was in and around
Sezanne.
Cavalry: C3 Heavy (shown as B3 on the map/error), C5 Medium + 1 HA batt, C6 Medium
and C9a light cavalry (this unit included two vital Polish HA batteries) and C9b+c.
ALLIES.
Prussian.
Prussian
cavalry only. C1, C3, C4 and C5. No infantry would get there on time.
Russian:
Russian
infantry: B1 (Guard), B2
Russian
cavalry, C1 and C5. (Cossacks)
Austrian:
Virtually
their whole force, except for 1 light cavalry regt. This included 6 brigades of
infantry and 4 brigades of cavalry. The Austrians were low in cavalry from the
start.
So
the Allies were strong in the south with infantry and strong in the north with
cavalry. But taking Paris in 15 moves would be a hard slog. Superior Allied
artillery might be the critical factor.
THE BATTLE.
The
task for the Allies was to take 5 out of the 9 available buildings representing
Paris by move 15. (or ensure a minimum of 5 out the 8 French brigades were
either routed or in retreat by that time) I think this subsequent addendum was
provided half way through the game when it became clearer that many Allied
units would still be on the outskirts of Paris by move 15) Playing on a table
of 17 x 9 feet inevitably takes a little time to move units across from one side
to the other. The French were permitted a degree of flexibility in the initial
deployment. Ross, John and Dave decided to concentrate their cavalry in the
north and deploy two brigades of infantry, one in the southern sector of Paris
and the other in the village of St Maur to the south-east of the capital and
defend the river line to slow the Austrians. Their two remaining brigades of
infantry supported by some reasonable cavalry would just have to slug it out
against a large Prussian cavalry presence and take on some quality Russian
infantry and cavalry at the same time.
Crossing
the northern stream proved a problem for Neil, the Prussian commander. The two
Polish horse batteries proving a real obstacle to Prussian progress.
The Polish horse batteries can be seen in the top left hand corner. One infantry battalion blocked the bridge in square formation. Prussian horse artillery began to inflict damage on this solitary unit.
The French
5th brigade was the only French unit not permitted to “relocate” to
an alternative (safer) position as it had only just arrived from the east in
time, shadowed by Prussian light cavalry all the way. The 5th
brigade detached the engineers who raced back to Paris in order to blow
whichever bridges they could lay their hands on in time; other engineers having
already been captured by Austrian forces the previous day. The remaining units
occupied the village of Aucnay but were almost immediately under pressure from
Russian infantry and supporting guns.
An
opportunity for the French 3rd Cavalry Cuirassier brigade to hit a
Cossack brigade in the flank was missed (the Cossacks were well supported by
Russian Guard Cuirassiers so one can understand the hesitation and a genuine
fear of a counter-attack) and this crucial French brigade spent the remainder
of the battle occupying a central position but unsure which way to go.
In the end it engaged no one.
In the end it engaged no one.
Further
south, the Austrian 5th brigade, commanded by Ashley, attacked
across the bridge against the Bavarian 11th brigade, who were
defending St Maur but were repeatedly thrown back every time.
Had the Austrians had more artillery support, this attack might have proved more fruitful. As it was, the Austrian artillery moved north-west towards Paris, sidestepping this blockage. The Bavarian 11th brigade, commanded by Jonathan, successfully held this position till the end. It was to prove the only crumb of comfort for the French defenders. The remaining Austrian Corps, commanded by Paul, headed west and various bridge crossings were attempted, some more successful than others. The image below shows the Austro-Hungarian 6th brigade. (Art Miniaturen figures)
The French 9th brigade (conscript) was given the task of defending the southern sector of Paris and this would include the village of Charenton and the bridges south of it. The HA battery from the French 5th cavalry brigade was detached to this sector and helped in keeping the Austrians, initially, at bay.
Had the Austrians had more artillery support, this attack might have proved more fruitful. As it was, the Austrian artillery moved north-west towards Paris, sidestepping this blockage. The Bavarian 11th brigade, commanded by Jonathan, successfully held this position till the end. It was to prove the only crumb of comfort for the French defenders. The remaining Austrian Corps, commanded by Paul, headed west and various bridge crossings were attempted, some more successful than others. The image below shows the Austro-Hungarian 6th brigade. (Art Miniaturen figures)
The French 9th brigade (conscript) was given the task of defending the southern sector of Paris and this would include the village of Charenton and the bridges south of it. The HA battery from the French 5th cavalry brigade was detached to this sector and helped in keeping the Austrians, initially, at bay.
Back
towards the north, the Prussian cavalry had at last begun to make its
superiority in numbers begin to tell and the French in this sector, commanded
by Ross, simply had no reserves to replace vital lost units. The French 5th
infantry brigade, threatened by cavalry, was forced into square and took some punishment
from Russian artillery.
The French then threw an unfortunate 1D8 dice role and scored a modified -4 resulting in a failed brigade test** and a retreat with their backs to the Russian Guard infantry and Russian Cuirassiers. This coincided with the Allies winning the “initiative” and effectively having 2 moves on the trot and so the Russians threw themselves on the rear of the hapless French infantry The subsequent disaster, and the loss of all six battalions in one foul swoop, meant that holding a French line further west would simply not be possible.
French dragoons did their best and counter-attacked repeatedly and by the end most of the Prussian cavalry would not be there to fight another day. But Prussian aggression, had given the Russian commander, Mike, a smoother path.
The French then threw an unfortunate 1D8 dice role and scored a modified -4 resulting in a failed brigade test** and a retreat with their backs to the Russian Guard infantry and Russian Cuirassiers. This coincided with the Allies winning the “initiative” and effectively having 2 moves on the trot and so the Russians threw themselves on the rear of the hapless French infantry The subsequent disaster, and the loss of all six battalions in one foul swoop, meant that holding a French line further west would simply not be possible.
French dragoons did their best and counter-attacked repeatedly and by the end most of the Prussian cavalry would not be there to fight another day. But Prussian aggression, had given the Russian commander, Mike, a smoother path.
The
Russian advance was steady and relentless. In fact by the close the Russians
were the only army not to suffer one single lost unit. It was only a matter of
time before the Russian Guard would be knocking at the door of Paris itself.
In
the south, the engineers from the French 5th infantry brigade at
last (at the second attempt) blew the bridge in the southern sector of Paris.
But it was too little too late. Austrian units were beginning to pour over
other bridges as yet another French brigade, this time the 9th conscript
brigade, commanded by Dave, crumbled.
So by
the end it was an Allied victory, more on the basis of routed French units
rather than taking any of Paris itself. The seeds had already been sown. Some
of the French generals wondered what might have happened if they had been given
a Guards brigade or even a little more in the way of artillery to add to the
paltry one Bavarian foot battery. So
many quality French units left in Sezanne who saw no action throughout the
campaign.
From left to right Neil (Prussians) Mike (Russians) Jonathan (French), Paul (Austrians) Dave (French) and Ross (French) Ashley not seen! (Austrians)
Paris on the right with Aucnay on the left close to where the French 5th brigade disintegrated.
Prussian light cavalry enter the streets of Paris.
French engineers finally manage to blow the bridge in the southern sector of Paris, as Austrian infantry approach.
From left to right Neil (Prussians) Mike (Russians) Jonathan (French), Paul (Austrians) Dave (French) and Ross (French) Ashley not seen! (Austrians)
Well
done to Jonathan and the Bavarian 11th brigade for holding St Maur
against successive Austrian attacks across the bridge. Disappointment that the
one French heavy cavalry brigade was not put to greater use and congratulations
to the Russian commander, Mike, for a cautious yet effective use of all three
arms and losing no units in the process. All things said, the French did as
well as could have been expected.
**
The Brigade test explained: Instead of formal written orders, every brigade
must pass a test to see if it is capable of executing orders. This lessens the
reactive helicopter view of wargaming where players say “if you do that, I’ll
do this”.
So,
using a 1D8 follow the table below:
BRIGADE COMMAND TEST
(must be taken at the start to every
move)
|
+1
|
C-in-C
visible and within 60cm to the brigade commander. (+2 if C-in-C is adjacent)
|
+1
|
For each
neighbouring inf / cav brigade units within 18cm. (2
supporting brigades = +2)
|
|
+1
|
Brigade
is advancing.
|
|
X (varies)
|
Brigade
commander’s rating. Excellent +2. Good +1. Average 0. Poor -1
|
|
X (varies)
|
Brigade
rating. Guard +2, Light +1, Line 0, Militia / Line Cossack / Landwehr
-1
|
|
X (varies)
|
No of
units annihilated. Subtract number of red rings on the brigade commander.
|
|
X (varies)
|
% of
casualties already lost. 25% = -1, or 50% = -3 or 75% = -6
|
|
X (varies)
|
Number
of KILLS inflicted per unit in the previous move
|
|
-1
|
Any
enemy units within
36cm to the flank
or rear. (excluding limbered artillery)
|
|
-1
|
At
least one unit within the brigade under artillery fire and has sustained
KILLS.
|
|
-1
|
Per
unit in DISORDER.
|
|
+X (varies)
|
Throw
1D8
|
Score
|
Brigade Command Test results (The result continues to apply until the next test is taken)
|
3+
|
Pass
test. Carry on as normal.
|
0-2 Hold
|
Brigade
on HOLD orders for that move. No forward movement. No counter-charge by
cavalry or infantry.
Units
can change formation and fire. Infantry cannot form square but existing
squares remain operational.
Can only
melee if attacked. Place a yellow ring
on the brigade commander.
|
-1~ -3 Retire
|
Brigade
must RETIRE ½ move, including artillery which must now limber up. Infantry cannot form square. Existing
squares no longer exist and become disordered, gaining a white ring. They are
treated as being in column. Place an orange ring on the brigade commander.
|
-4~ -5 Retreat
|
Brigade
must RETREAT ¾ move and face the rear.
Artillery to limber up. If
retreat is blocked by other friendly units, river, bridge (unblocked or
blocked), or woods then all units must surrender. Same rules as above for
squares. Place a brown ring on the
brigade commander.
|
-6 or <
|
Brigade
removed….including any attached artillery.
|
Brilliant bat rep Francis, love those cuirass on both sides! What make are the ranks deep of Austrian line?
ReplyDeleteA stunning battle!